The Church of Satan

The Church of Satan crushed by Jesus
Genesis 3:15

The Satanic Temple is an active philosophical religious organization founded in 2013. It does not recognize any concept of the supernatural but instead promotes a negative response to fundamental religious beliefs. The Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America foundation states that the Satanic Temple has opened a new abortion facility and is sending abortion drugs through the mail, avoiding legal issues by claiming that abortion is one of their “religious rites.” The existence of organized satanic churches like the Satanic Temple is not new, but the unorganized church of Satan has always been around, making these claims about Christian beliefs:

PRAYER – “Prayer is useless and distracts people from useful activity. No god ever answered any prayer at any time, nor ever will.” (From a poster distributed by Madalyn O’Hair.)

DEALING WITH OTHERS – Satanists claim that “survival of the fittest” offers a more fulfilling and practical answer to everyone’s needs.

MORAL CONDUCT – “Practice with joy the ‘seven deadly Christian sins.’ Engage in sex freely in accordance with your needs, be it heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, or with one or more consenting adults.” (Frank Zindler in a lecture at Ohio State in 1995 and in the American Atheist Magazine, which he edited from 1995 to 2009.)

The Christian Response to the church of Satan:

PRAYER – God’s answer to prayer is usually spiritual, not physical. 12 Step programs work, and prayer molds personality and attitude. James 5:16 explains this, and James 4:1-3 tells us why prayers for the physical are not answered. Isaiah 55:8 and John 9:3 give a practical purpose for prayers.

DEALING WITH OTHERS – What happens when you are no longer “the fittest”? Do any of us want to be discounted when we get old?

MORAL CONDUCT – What are the results of practicing the “seven deadly Christian sins”? What effect does immorality have on our kids, mates, parents, and society as a whole? How does an immoral lifestyle give a purpose to our existence?

We live at a time when over 40% of the population answers “none” when asked about their religious affiliation. You can’t be a “none.” You have only two choices – either be a Christian or be a member of the church of Satan. Read Matthew 12:30 (or Luke 11:23) and think about what you really want to use as a guide to your life.

— John N. Clayton © 2025

Reference: Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America

Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906) was an anti-slavery campaigner and a suffragist who was instrumental in obtaining women’s right to vote. She was honored by having her image on the U.S. silver dollar and half dollar minted from 1979 to 1981 and again in 1999.

Not a Forced Religion

Christianity - Not a Forced Religion

The teachings of Jesus Christ are radically different from those of other religions. Perhaps the most notable are the teachings about how to gain converts. In the “Sermon on the Mount” (Matthew 5–7), Jesus clearly states that those who follow Him do so voluntarily. Following Him is not a forced religion, and Christ’s disciples emphasized this as the Church rapidly grew.

In Acts 17:22-34, Paul describes the Christian faith and concludes in verses 29–30 that people should not think God’s nature is physical. In Acts 17:30, Paul writes, “God has looked with indulgence on the days of man’s ignorance, but now He is announcing to everyone everywhere the need to think differently.” Paul uses the word “repent,” meaning to think differently. Following Christ is a personal decision, not a forced religion or cult. This contrasts sharply with other religious belief systems.

Some individuals claiming to be Christians have violated Christ’s teachings by resorting to violence to force others to convert. The Crusades, the teachings of the Mormon Church, and various cult leaders all engaged in violence that directly contradicts Christ’s teachings. There is not a single statement by Christ or the Apostles advocating the use of force to gain converts.

An English translation of the Koran by N.J. Dawood, a Muslim, is available from Penguin Classics. Reading it reveals a stark contrast to Christ’s teachings. Mohammed 47:3-5 instructs Muslims to strike off the heads of unbelievers. The passages in 2:178 and 2:179 state that fighting and bloodshed are ordained for Muslims. Repentance 9:4-7 and 122-125 command Muslims to wage war. Claims that these are mistranslations are untrue; Muslims have followed these teachings for centuries, and fundamentalists still do today.

Hinduism also involves coercion. Since 2014, India’s Hindu Bharatiya Janata Party has been in power, arresting individuals they believe are proselytizing Hindus. Government violence against non-Hindus has led to the killing of Christians and Muslims and the confiscation of their property.

The teachings of Christ shine brightly in a world filled with violence. The word “gospel” means “good news,” and the good news is that Christianity is not a forced religion. Jesus Christ offers the freedom, peace, and hope that people desire to have in their lives.

— John N. Clayton © 2025

 Earth’s Age Is Irrelevant

 Earth’s Age Is Irrelevant

How old is planet Earth? Why does it matter? Various branches of science agree, based on substantial evidence, that our planet is about 4.5 billion years old. Many Christians argue that it is only a few thousand years old, and they make it a matter of faith. In other words, if you disagree with their timeline, you are an evolutionist and Bible denier. Scientists have methods for calculating Earth’s age, and they have nothing to do with faith or denying the Bible. The truth is that Earth’s age is irrelevant to Christian faith.

Why do many Christians insist on a “young” Earth? It may be because they believe the Bible says so. They base that on a document written by an archbishop of the Church of Ireland, James Ussher, published in 1654. He calculated that Earth’s creation took place on October 22, 4004 B.C. He based his calculations on the assumption that the genealogies of Genesis are complete and that they are recorded for the purpose of chronology. Those assumptions are not correct. The biblical genealogies are incomplete, and their purpose is to show lineage, not chronology. Of course, the lineage eventually led to the Messiah. Because early English translations of the Bible included Ussher’s chronology, many came to believe it was the gospel truth.

Another significant reason many Christians today choose to believe in the young-earth doctrine is that they think it refutes evolution. Scientists don’t insist on billions of years to allow time for evolution. A little-known fact that scientists are reluctant to admit is that 4.5 billion years is not long enough for unguided evolution to create the diversity of life on Earth today. In reality, no amount of time is sufficient for random mutations and natural selection to accomplish the task. But not all of the 4.5 billion years are available for evolution. A large amount of time would be required for the planet to cool and become suitable for life. Then, more time would be needed for non-living elements to organize themselves into the first living cells. (They couldn’t do it by themselves in any amount of time, but that’s another issue.)

The bottom line is that Earth’s age is irrelevant to Christian faith. The age of the Earth is essential to the sciences of geology, paleontology, astronomy, physics, chemistry, and others. As it relates to the Christian faith and the accuracy of the Bible, Earth’s age is irrelevant and always will be. Archbishop Ussher was an intelligent church leader and scholar, but his chronology fails because he based it on false assumptions. False assumptions lead to false conclusions.

— Roland Earnst © 2025

Intelligence and Wisdom Are Different

Intelligence and Wisdom Are Different

Some of the smartest people in history were not wise. Albert Einstein was very intelligent, but he struggled with simple tasks, such as tying his shoes. He would get lost on his way to his office and couldn’t remember birthdays. In 1952, the prime minister of Israel wanted him to become the country’s new president, but Einstein said he lacked the aptitude or experience to “deal properly with people and to exercise official function.” There is a clear distinction between intelligence and wisdom.

There are many kinds of intelligence, and my son Tim exemplifies this. Tim was mentally challenged based on tests involving normal daily functions. His school placed him in classes for the mentally impaired, but on a verbal test, he scored within the normal range. His ability to hold an intelligent conversation was fairly standard, but his capacity to care for himself was nonexistent.

Being wise is a gift from God and is described in James 3:17: “But the wisdom that comes from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality and without hypocrisy.” James 1:5 says, “If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God who gives to all men liberally and does not put conditions on what He gives, and it shall be given to him.”

Proverbs 14:32-35 tells us, “When calamity comes, the wicked are brought down, but even in death the righteous have a refuge. Wisdom reposes in the heart of the discerning, but in the heart of fools she is not known. Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.”

We can’t deny the difference between intelligence and wisdom. Will America survive the leadership of intelligent people who lack biblical wisdom? As our nation drifts away from belief in God, we can find the answer in the lessons of history that we seem to forget.

— John N. Clayton © 2025

An Attack on Love

An Attack on Love

The famous Italian poet Dante Alighieri, writing around the year 1300, wrote that “all of the seven deadly sins are an attack on love. Pride, envy, and anger result from perverted love, sloth from insufficient love, and greed, gluttony, and lust from an excessive love of earthly goods.”

The Bible teaches us that God is love (1 John 4:8), and Jesus instructed that Christians should have a special kind of love, expressed in the Greek word “agape.” Christians should see every human being as worthy of love because they are created in the image of God. Dante’s observation that the things God hates are an attack on love resonates with the current state of the world, as many turn away from God.

The Bible uses various Greek words to describe how God wants us to love. The one Greek word that is NOT used is “eros,” from which our English word “erotic” is derived. Those who reject God often turn to a distorted form of love that is more than destructive. It results in frustration and prevents those involved from experiencing the true joy that God created in physical love.

Other religious systems promote what amounts to an attack on love. Practices such as polygamy, polyandry, incestuous relationships, and pedophilia all lead to abuse and frustration for everyone involved. In Matthew 19:8-9 and Mark 10:5-9, Jesus speaks of the hardness of men’s hearts, which results in women being treated as pawns and obstructs God’s plan for the nuclear family.

Hard-heartedness fosters greed, war, violence, and abuse. Ultimately, political systems that endorse such behavior will collapse. You either learn from history or repeat it. The question is, what will happen to America as atheism, naturalism, and secularism replace the teachings of Christ, and as the sins God hates bear their bitter fruit? Only time will tell.

— John N. Clayton © 2025

Reference: Power for Today for September 12, 2025, by Andy Wall and Wikipedia.  

Darwinian Toxic Masculinity

Darwinian Toxic Masculinity

In recent years, many people have decried “toxic masculinity.” The term started trending on Google searches in 2015. Many social science authors have written about it, defining it in different ways. WebMd.com describes it as “an attitude or set of social guidelines stereotypically associated with manliness that often have a negative impact on men, women, and society.” The topic is not new, and even Charles Darwin addressed it. You might call it Darwinian toxic masculinity.

Are men pigs? In a bestselling book titled The Moral Animal, Robert Wright wrote, “Human males are by nature oppressive, possessive, flesh-obsessed pigs.” In Men and Marriage, George Gilder stated, “Men are, by nature, violent, sexually predatory, and irresponsible.” Where does this hostile view of men come from? We suggest Charles Darwin has something to do with it.

Darwin believed that males are superior to females. He argued that men can achieve a “higher eminence” than women in any field of effort. His conclusion was that “the average of mental power in man must be above that of woman.” He believed this was true because of natural selection. Male animals must do many things to win their females and even more to keep them. Therefore, natural selection favors the dominant and combative male. He concluded that their struggles and challenges “increase their mental powers.” Since he saw humans as merely evolved animals, Darwinian toxic masculinity was a consequence of evolution and natural selection.

Darwin also claimed that dark-skinned people were less evolved than those with light skin, and women were less evolved than men because men had to “struggle in order to maintain themselves and their families.” With all the criticism of men’s behavior, perhaps we should call it Darwinian toxic masculinity. Contrasting Darwin’s mistaken ideas, Jesus Christ is the perfect example of true masculinity. He showed love and forgiveness as He made the ultimate sacrifice for our sins. Men today need to learn from Him.

— Roland Earnst © 2025

References: Wikipedia, WebMd.com, and The Toxic War on Masculinity: How Christianity Reconciles the Sexes by Nancy R. Pearcey (available on Amazon)

History of Religious Freedom

History of Religious Freedom

One of the things young people won’t learn in any public school class is the history of religious freedom and Christian persecution.  At the time of the American Revolution, Virginia was the most populous colony, and in 1784, the legislature sought to pass a bill supporting the Anglican Church. It was rejected primarily due to the influence of James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. Madison argued that religion will flourish only if supported by voluntary contributions.

Moral issues became part of the history of religious freedom. Evolutionists justified slavery by claiming that black people were less evolved and closer to apes. Ignorance of what the Bible teaches caused even church members to embrace slavery. At the time of the Civil War, a common argument for slavery used the biblical story of Ham, which in Hebrew means dark-skinned. Genesis 9:22-27 describes a curse placed on Ham’s descendants, saying they would be slaves of Shem and Japheth. Religious people joined in the enslavement of blacks by quoting those verses.

Slavery was wrong on both religious and evolutionary grounds. First, interracial marriage scrambled the human genome since the time of Ham, making such a claim genetically wrong. More to the point is the fact that the New Testament did away with all racial profiling. Galatians 3:26-29 tells Christians that in Christ, there are no distinctions between individuals. “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

Both political parties in America today attack what the Bible teaches us about moral choices. The history of religious freedom and Christian persecution shows that this is not new. The first-century Romans persecuted Christians. Anyone who teaches biblical principles of moral behavior will likely endure persecution.  Jesus said, “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first (John 15:18).”

— John N. Clayton © 2025

Reference: “Public Funding of Religious Activity in 18th-Century America” pewresearch.org

The Power to Change

The Power to Change

One of the greatest barriers to improving things in our world today is resistance to change. Without needed change, situations deteriorate and human misery increases. This is true on every level, from moral to political. Racism of the past must be abandoned, as does anti-Christian and anti-Jewish hatred. What society needs is the power to change.

The Bible’s key concept on this subject is “repentance.” Repentance is not confessing everything you did that was wrong. Repentance means changing the way you think. In Acts 2:38, Peter gave the key to having God’s Spirit work in our lives. Many preachers emphasized the baptism part of what Peter said, and the result is that people got wet with no change in their lives. They totally missed the power to change.

Peter’s message was, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.” The Holy Spirit is God living in us and giving us the power to change. The first step to achieving a meaningful life change is to change the way you think. If you don’t change how you think, baptism is meaningless.

The Bible is full of stories about men who changed their way of thinking. Moses changed from a weak Egyptian prince to a leader of Israel. Jonah changed from a man running from God to a spokesman to Nineveh. Peter changed from a denier to a proclaimer, and Paul changed from a persecutor to a preacher. Change is not easy, and it can take time to change old habits.

The journey to change begins with thinking differently, allowing the Holy Spirit to work within us, and then acting on what God has called you to do. Those Biblical examples are beyond most of us, but God has a purpose for everyone. God doesn’t create any junk, but He also doesn’t force us to accept the ministry He calls us to. Your calling may be in agriculture or industry. It may be helping someone with physical, mental, or emotional needs. It may be raising or teaching children.

God gives us the power to change, but it doesn’t happen until we change our thinking.

— John N. Clayton © 2025

Evolution Nonsense and the Scopes Anniversary

Evolution Nonsense and the Scopes Anniversary

A century ago, in July of 1925, John Scopes was tried in Dayton, Tennessee. He was accused of teaching human evolution in a public school in defiance of a Tennessee law. One hundred years later, there is still no intelligent approach to the issue of teaching evolution. Instead, skeptics and atheists have used evolution as a club against the Bible and Christianity in general. At the same time, poorly informed religious figures have said foolish things about evolution, leading many well-educated young people to assume that belief in God is a barbaric relic of the past. Both sides are guilty of spreading evolution nonsense.

The fact is that everyone believes in evolution. Evolution is defined as “change over time,” and God has built into all life the ability to change and adapt to environmental situations. With the intelligent guidance of horticulturalists, crop plants and farm animals have changed to provide food for humanity. Any farmer can tell you how selective breeding and hybridization provide improvements in corn, grain, or animals. Look at the many varieties of dogs or cattle. God’s design of living things allows changes in animals and plants, enabling them to survive while also providing food to sustain a growing population.

A careful reading of the Genesis account can eliminate the evolution nonsense that creates a conflict between science and faith in the Bible. What separates humans from all other forms of life on our planet is not our physical bodies. The Bible tells us that the human body came from the dust of the Earth. All life is chemically the same. What separates humans from animals is that we are created in the image of God. The Bible uses the Hebrew word “bara” (create), uniquely referring to what God can do. It is used only three times in Genesis chapter one. The first instance is in verse one, referring to the cosmos. It is used in verse 21 when God created the first life. The final time is in verse 27, where it describes the creation of man and woman in the image of God. It is the spiritual makeup of humans, not our physical body, that makes us unique.

As the 100th anniversary of the Scopes trial approaches this month, major newspapers and magazines will publish articles ridiculing the Bible. We will be addressing this subject further, and we urge our readers to be informed and proactive in helping others avoid evolution nonsense, whether it comes from skeptics or religious figures. God calls us to a faith that is intelligent and discerning.

— John N. Clayton © 2025

Sextortion Scam and Teenagers

Sextortion Scam and Teenagers

If you have a teenage son or grandson, you should be aware of a sextortion scam that has caused 30 suicide deaths of young men and countless struggles for many more. In this scam, a teen boy receives a message from someone who appears to be a teenage girl suggesting that someone they both know has told her to contact him. When they strike up a conversation, the scammer suggests that they exchange nude pictures, usually on a second app such as Snapchat or WhatsApp or in a private text message.

Once the boy does that, blackmail starts. The scammer tells him that he must send money or his nude photos will be sent to mutual contacts or friends on social media. The blackmailer accuses the male teen of being a criminal for exposing himself, and he will be put on a sex offender list.

This situation is tempting for a teen male who has hormones flowing. A nude picture of an attractive teenage girl is the bait. Teens who have grown up in a single-parent home are especially vulnerable to this scam, and those who work with teens need to be aware of it.

Churches must provide guidance on moral issues affecting teenagers. Years ago, I tried such a class with a woman teaching the girls and me teaching the boys. It was challenging and drew both praise and flak from parents. With social media today, such classes have become increasingly essential and more difficult.

There are resources providing help concerning this sextortion scam. Parents wanting to know what is available can contact this ministry at 269-687-9426 or 800-843-5678. Also, for many tips and resources, click THIS LINK to see a USA Today article by Rachel Hale and Veronica Bravo titled “What to do if you’re a victim.”

— John N. Clayton © 2025