The Universe Archives

November 5, 2026November 4, 2026

Evidence for God – Part 2

2- A Fine-Tuned Universe Exists

If you want to bake a cake, you need the right ingredients in the right amounts, mixed correctly, and baked at the right temperature for the exact length of time. A universe is far more complex than a cake. Therefore, building a universe would require far greater precision, with many more ingredients in the right amounts, assembled in the right sequence, over the exact amount of time. Every factor must be precisely fine-tuned.

Scientists recognize that the universe requires fine-tuning for complex life to exist. The number of factors that must be fine-tuned is vast, but five essential ones are these:

Gravitational Force Constant – This force holds us on the ground instead of flying off into space. More than that, it holds the planet together and makes it round. It also holds the Moon in orbit around the Earth and the planets in orbit around the Sun. It holds together the Milky Way and all other galaxies. This force must be strong enough to form stars and planets, but if it were too strong, stars would burn out quickly, and no planets would form.

Electromagnetic Force Constant – This force holds atoms together. It must be just right for chemical bonds to form, creating molecules that make up everything, including our bodies.

Strong Nuclear Force Constant – This force holds together the protons and neutrons in the nuclei of atoms. It must be just right to form stable atoms.

Weak Nuclear Force Constant – This force regulates radioactive decay and must be precisely correct to form stars such as our Sun.

Cosmological Constant – This force controls the universe’s expansion speed, balancing gravity’s attractive pull with the repulsive force driving space to expand. It must be extremely precise to prevent the universe from flying apart or collapsing on itself.

A properly “baked” universe requires that all of these constants and many more parameters be just right. The chance of all of them coming together by accident is beyond impossible. Fine-tuning the universe requires intelligent planning, and it could not have happened by accident. Realizing that and not wanting to consider a Designer, scientists have devised a hypothesis to explain the universe’s fine-tuning. It is the theory of multiple universes, or the multiverse theory. It suggests there must be an almost infinite number of universes with different parameters, and we just happen to live in the one that got everything right. This idea has many problems, but we can’t even call it science because it lacks evidence and can’t be tested.

On the other hand, plenty of evidence suggests that God created the universe. Romans 1:20: “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.”

Meet us at the International Conference on Missions at America’s Center in St. Louis, November 12-14, 2026, booth 1223 in the Exhibit Hall.

October 9, 2026October 9, 2026

When a Star Explodes

Last month, in September 2026, astronomers observed an exploding star. When a star explodes, it becomes a supernova. The supernova now being observed is in a spiral galaxy about 45 million light-years away from Earth in the constellation Pegasus. The galaxy is known as NGC 7331, and the star in question has been designated SN2026aaiv.

It is important to know how far away this galaxy is, and astronomers can confirm the distance using various measurement methods. Since this exploding star is 45 million light-years away, it means the star exploded 45,000,000 years ago. Astronomers observe several thousand supernovae in distant galaxies every year, but the last one observed in our Milky Way galaxy was in 1604. We mentioned before that in 1987 a supernova occurred in the Large Magellanic Cloud, which is only 160,000 light-years away, so it was only 160,000 years ago.

What is the purpose of exploding stars? When a star explodes and becomes a supernova, conditions are right to create heavier elements, without which we could not exist. Without heavier elements such as iron, copper, gold, lead, and uranium, Earth wouldn’t be here, and neither would we. Supernovae also produce oxygen and silicon.

In the long, distant past, God used supernovae to create the elements that made life possible. Suggesting that the universe is only a few thousand years old does not square with the facts. When God established the universe, He started the processes we see happening today. The original hydrogen present soon after the cosmic creation event has gradually formed heavier elements inside stars. When a star explodes and becomes a supernova, it becomes the birthplace of the heaviest elements.

The question we must consider is whether God is playing a trick on us. If the universe is only a few thousand years old, why are we seeing a star millions of light-years away become a supernova? If it didn’t happen 45,000,000 years ago, is God trying to fool us into thinking we are seeing something that never happened? Are we really observing the past when we look deep into space? If astronomers look at the Sun, they are seeing what it was like 8 minutes ago, because that’s how long it takes sunlight to reach us. Compute that out to a star billions of miles away.

If the supernovae we observe aren’t real, then God is trying to fool us by making us think they happened millions of years ago when they happened only a few thousand years ago, or never happened at all. I don’t believe that our creator God is deceptive. He keeps His promises, and you can’t keep promises if you deceive people. (See Titus 1:2 and Hebrews 6:18. )There’s plenty of evidence that G o d exists, and when a star explodes, we see evidence that the universe is billions of years old.

Reference: space.com

October 5, 2026October 4, 2026

Something Rather than Nothing

If someone tells you that God doesn’t exist, ask them: if there is no God, why is there anything at all? In other words, “Why is there something rather than nothing?”

After many years, even centuries, of insisting that the universe is eternal and had no beginning, scientists finally reached the consensus that the universe had a beginning. There was once no time, space, or matter/energy. Nothing existed. According to currently accepted science, the universe, including matter, energy, space, and time, came into existence approximately 13.8 billion years ago. If none of those things existed, what caused them to come into existence?

The beginning is commonly known as the Big Bang, but I prefer to call it the Cosmic Creation Event. If nothing existed before then, how did the universe come into existence? Whatever explanation you suggest, it must be outside of space and time and immaterial. Those things could not have created themselves. Einstein’s famous E=Mc² equation (energy equals mass times the speed of light squared) tells us that matter and energy are two forms of the same thing.

If nothing existed before the Cosmic Creation Event or Big Bang, why does anything exist now? What originated the things we can see and measure—the universe and even ourselves? In other words, why is there something rather than nothing? I suggest that if you think about what could have caused the beginning, it would have to be outside of time and space and immaterial—something unseen. What could that be? “By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God’s command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible” (Hebrews 11:3). The God described in the Bible perfectly matches the requirements for the ultimate cause. (See Genesis 1:1.)

September 8, 2026September 7, 2026

Space Travel Takes Time

With so much talk about space travel, it’s easy to forget how vast the solar system and the universe are. In movies, spacecraft travel faster than light, which is impossible, and reach their destinations in minutes. In real life, space travel takes time.

It’s possible to reach the Moon in a few days; however, a future trip to Mars will take up to nine months. A round trip will take more than 3 years because the alignment of Earth and Mars creates a launch window about once every 26 months. Add nine months, nine months, and 26 months, and you get 44 months. How about traveling to Mercury? Two unmanned spacecraft are on the way and are expected to arrive in a few months.

Mercury is the least explored of our inner planets, but a joint project between the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) was launched in 2018. In April of next year, the two probes are scheduled to arrive near Mercury to gather observations. So, after eight years in space, the BepiColombo project will again demonstrate that space travel takes time.

On September 1, 2026, a nonprofit organization called the Fermi Explorer Mission (FEM) announced plans to send a probe toward Alpha Centauri by 2029. Alpha Centauri and Proxima Centauri are the closest stars to our Sun. But “close” is hardly the right word, since they’re actually 4.4 light-years away. Because spacecraft cannot reach light speed, this probe is expected to arrive in 80,000 years. If it launches in 2029, arrives 80,000 years later, gathers information, and sends a strong enough signal to be received on Earth, the signal will take 4.4 years to arrive.

If FEM’s plan works, will anyone be alive to receive the information it gathers? Space travel takes time, and human life spans are short. The Fermi Explorer Mission team is a nonprofit organization, and they’re asking for financial donations to get the mission off the ground. This is definitely a long-term investment.

Knowing that space travel takes time, I think God has given us a beautiful planet where we have been richly blessed. He has also given us a curiosity to want to know what’s out there. What is out there is a massive, incomprehensible universe that we will never fully explore or understand. We can also never fully understand God’s invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—which we can clearly see in the things He has made (Romans 1:20).

Reference: Space.com

August 3, 2026August 2, 2026

The Pale Blue Dot

The picture above is the “Pale Blue Dot” photograph, taken by the Voyager 1 spacecraft on Valentine’s Day, February 14, 1990. At the time, Voyager 1 was 3.8 billion miles (6 billion km) from Earth and moving away. The camera was about to be shut down to save power, since it was not going to fly close to any planet as it was leaving the solar system. Before shutdown, the mission commander ordered the probe to take 60 images to form a “Family Portrait of the Solar System.” Thirty-four minutes after it took this picture, the camera was shut down forever. In the picture, the Sun is below, and the pale blue dot you can barely see in a sunbeam is planet Earth.

This year, prominent atheists became upset by astronaut Victor Glover’s words aboard Artemis 2 during its historic trip around the Moon. Some even expressed concern about the “separation of church and space.” However, when he spoke from space, he seemed to receive approval from the other astronauts, but not from atheists on the ground. Some of Glover’s words that apparently upset atheists include, “You’re on a spaceship called Earth that was created to give us a place to live in the universe. You are special. In all of this emptiness, this is a whole bunch of nothing, this thing we call the universe, you have this oasis, this beautiful place that we get to exist together.” The pale blue dot is not insignificant.

Why should those words distress anyone? Many early scientists explored creation because they believed in an orderly universe created by an intelligent God. Many astronauts have said that being in space gave them a spiritual experience as they realized that Earth reveals design and purpose. Many leading science popularizers have tried to tell us that science destroys Christian belief. Richard Dawkins, Bill Nye, Michael Shermer, Lawrence Krauss, and others have written popular books arguing that science makes belief in God unnecessary and implausible. The truth is that scientific discoveries continue to support belief in God and challenge atheism.

Astronomer Carl Sagan was partially responsible for the picture of the pale blue dot, and he popularized the term in his book by the same name. He wrote, “Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all its vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.” He also said that Earth is such a tiny pale blue dot in the universe that it shows we have no privileged position in the cosmos. Sagan was a brilliant man, but he overlooked the fact that Someone did come from elsewhere to save us. Victor Glover knows that is true. He said that we are not a lonely cosmic accident, but instead, we are loved, and those who believe in Jesus Christ agree.

July 14, 2026July 13, 2026

What Is a Star-Filled Sky Worth?

What is a star-filled sky worth? When David wrote his psalms, he sat under a star-filled sky without the problem of light pollution from city lights, satellites, or reflective mirrors in the sky. What would it be like if there were tens of thousands of mirrors in low Earth orbit reflecting sunlight down onto various dark areas of the planet?

A California company called Reflect Orbital (we reported on it earlier) hopes to put at least 50,000 mirrors in orbit by 2035 to reflect sunlight onto various customers on Earth’s surface. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has just given them permission to test the idea by launching their first space mirror into orbit.

Ben Nowak, the CEO of Reflect Orbital, suggests endless possibilities with sunlight not limited by geography or time of day. His company’s website says it could help search-and-rescue teams locate a missing person much more quickly. Another suggestion is that a city could have evenly lit streets without carbon emissions from electric-powered streetlights. Furthermore, construction projects could be completed in half the time because the crews could work safely through the night. And, of course, they also suggest mirrors reflecting sunlight onto solar arrays could extend their electricity-generating ability and reduce the use of fossil fuels.

The question is, what is a star-filled sky worth? Many people visit dark-sky locations to enjoy the stars and the Milky Way at night. The Colorado Plateau in the southwestern United States spans Colorado, Arizona, Utah, and New Mexico and is home to many of the best dark-sky locations. Places like Grand Canyon National Park, Zion National Park, Great Basin National Park, Arches National Park, Bryce Canyon National Park, Canyonlands National Park, and Natural Bridges National Monument are locations where visitors see the night sky without major light pollution.

So far, the emphasis has been on the economic advantages that could be derived from placing mirrors in space to direct sunlight into various locations. But a team of researchers is attempting to put an economic price on the cost of the loss of dark skies and the impact on tourism. They’re concerned about the “decline in visitor satisfaction when environmental quality deteriorates.” Another factor that must be considered is the effect on wildlife in areas where those mirrors are beamed and the circadian rhythm of animals, plants, and people from the diffused light that is scattered out into a larger area. God has given us a beautiful night sky that the psalmist was able to enjoy thousands of years ago. It is already disappearing. Will that be completely lost to coming generations? What is a star-filled sky worth?

References: space.com HERE and HERE

July 2, 2026June 28, 2026

Extraterrestrial Life Has Visited Earth

There continues to be a lot of talk and concern about intelligent alien life invading planet Earth. This shows up in news reports about the federal government releasing UFO (UAP) files and in recent movies. Is it possible that extraterrestrial life has visited Earth or is presently visiting Earth?

There is no evidence of intelligent alien life anywhere in our solar system. That means any extraterrestrial visitors would have to come from another star system elsewhere in our Milky Way. We don’t have any evidence, either through SETI or by any of our space telescopes, to indicate that intelligent life could be living on a planet or possibly a moon anywhere closer than many light-years from Earth. The closest star to our Sun is Proxima Centauri, which is 4.25 light-years away. So, any intelligent aliens would have to travel for many years, or possibly centuries, to get here. That assumes they could travel at 10% of the speed of light. Light speed is 186,000 miles (300,000,000 meters) per second. Einstein’s equations, which have been verified, indicate that it is not possible to travel anywhere near the speed of light. In fact, most studies suggest that 10% of the speed of light (19,000 miles per second) is the highest realistic speed for traveling through space.

The reason for the speed limitation involves the laws of physics, engineering constraints, and the amount of fuel required to propel a spacecraft. Because space has no air, traveling through it causes less resistance than traveling through our atmosphere. Once the spacecraft achieves its cruising speed, the propulsion system could be shut down. However, it would have to be used again many years later for deceleration at the end of the journey.

Even though there’s no air in space, there are hydrogen atoms and microscopic-sized grains of dust. Traveling at 19,000 miles per second, those dust particles would hit a spacecraft’s hull like speeding bullets, possibly piercing the hull unless it was sufficiently thick. Even striking hydrogen atoms would produce radiation that could erode the hull. Therefore, the hull would have to be thicker, increasing the mass and requiring more fuel. More fuel adds more weight, so you must add more fuel to compensate for the weight of that extra fuel. It’s a vicious cycle.

All of our rockets that propel payloads into space have used chemical reactions for propulsion. The mass of fuel needed for a spacecraft to reach a velocity of 19,000 miles per second would require more chemical fuel than the mass of the entire observable universe. Therefore, chemical propulsion is not feasible. Nuclear fusion is something that NASA has been working on, and it would be a more efficient way to generate propulsion, but getting a spaceship to cruise at 19,000 miles per second would require nuclear fuel equivalent to 150 times the spaceship’s mass. Therefore, that doesn’t seem like a good alternative. Another possibility would be antimatter propulsion, which exists only in theory. So far, scientists have created only 20 billionths of a gram of antimatter, and it lasts only a fraction of a second. Plus, the cost of producing it runs into hundreds of millions of dollars.

If extraterrestrial life has visited Earth, we would expect it to face many physical problems. Beyond that, there is the time required. If they were coming from a star system 50 light-years away and traveling at 10 percent of the speed of light, it would take them 500 years to get here. Unless these intelligent space aliens have extremely long lifespans, it would have to be a multi-generational trip. They would have to be much better than human earthlings at getting along with each other in confined spaces. They would also need a strong desire to visit our planet. If they were that interested in us, they could send electromagnetic radio waves, which travel at the speed of light.

The intelligence, technology, and physical resources required for extraterrestrials to travel to Earth are enormous. In addition, if they came from a civilization so advanced that they could solve all of these problems, why would they waste all those resources to visit the relatively primitive planet Earth?

Considering the facts, the probability that extraterrestrial life has visited Earth seems extremely slim. However, there is very strong evidence that extraterrestrial life has visited Earth. This planet has been visited by its Creator, and He looked like one of us. We have dealt with the evidence of that visitation many times before, and you can read the story of it in the first 14 verses of the Gospel of John in your Bible.

Reference: theconversation.com

June 22, 2026June 21, 2026

Fine-Tuning Explanation

Roberto Fumagalli is a Senior Lecturer in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics at King’s College London. Some months ago, he wrote an article in the Journal for General Philosophy of Science arguing that the fine-tuning of the laws and constants of our universe that makes life possible is real and requires a non-chance-based explanation. In other words, chance is not an adequate fine-tuning explanation for the existence of life. We have argued before that the universe is fine-tuned for intelligent life.

Fumagalli summarizes his argument as follows:

1- The universe is fine-tuned for intelligent life.

2- The probability of fine-tuning is not consistent with chance.

3- Therefore, fine-tuning calls for a non-chance-based explanation.

Scientists widely acknowledge that there is at least some fine-tuning of the parameters and laws of the universe and that it is not trivial. However, some critics seek to cast doubt on the need for fine-tuning, saying that we don’t know what other forms of advanced life might be possible. In other words, we only know of carbon-based life, but some suggest there may be other forms in which intelligent life could flourish. However, only very specific combinations of parameter values would permit the chemical complexity required for intelligent life. Therefore, the fine-tuning explanation does not support the possibility that chance is the cause.

The values of at least some of the fundamental parameters of the universe are very unlikely to fall within the range that permits intelligent life. Only an exceedingly narrow range of parameter values would allow life, especially advanced intelligent life. So, what are the possible fine-tuning explanations for the laws of physics and the relationships between the various forces?

One explanation is chance, but that does not seem very plausible. Another explanation is the multiple-universe theory proposed by some scientists. That would require a multitude of universes with different parameters, and we just happen to be the lucky ones in the one universe that allows life to exist. That is not a scientifically testable hypothesis, and it would require a fine-tuned, multi-universe-generating device. Another possibility is some unknown physics that scientists have not yet discovered, but that would also have to be fine-tuned.

The one fine-tuning explanation that seems by far the most acceptable, the most supportive of the evidence, is that our universe is the product of cosmic design by an infinite intelligence, namely the God of the Bible.

Reference: scienceandculture.com

May 14, 2026May 13, 2026

Space Aliens and Disclosure Day

There has been an explosion of comments in the news media and on social media about space aliens and Disclosure Day, following President Trump’s order to release previously classified information on UAPs (UFOs). At the same time, a “blockbuster” movie by Steven Spielberg is set to be released on June 12, 2026. Its title is Disclosure Day, based on a story by Spielberg, a firm believer in extraterrestrials.

Social media contains comments that the government’s disclosure of information about UAPs will challenge traditional religious beliefs. The current print issue of Moviemaker magazine features an interview with David Koepp, the screenwriter of the Disclosure Day movie. When the interviewer asked him if he believed in aliens, he compared aliens to God or religion. He said, “My personal belief is the same as my personal belief in God, which is why I think religion is an important part of Disclosure Day.” He goes on to say that his favorite theory about aliens is, “Yes, other intelligent life forms exist. Yes, they’ve been here. They may even be here now. We can’t perceive them.”

Thus far, what the government has released from its secret files is not much more than grainy pictures of objects in the sky that seem to move erratically, filmed from a distance. There doesn’t seem to be anything different from what we have seen before. Concerning space aliens and Disclosure Day, Spielberg claims that the movie will contain “more truth than fiction” and will “upend all established order.” That sounds to me like overblown promotional hoopla designed to sell more tickets.

What if the government released materials that conclusively demonstrated that aliens are visiting our planet? Would it mean the end of Christian faith? Would it refute the Bible? The answer is no and no. The Bible deals with the creation of the universe (Genesis 1:1) and the creation of life upon the Earth (the rest of Genesis 1 and 2). It also tells us that God created spiritual beings. It does not tell us whether God created physical creatures elsewhere within the universe. Even if God created life on other planets within the universe, which is questionable, and even if we learned that aliens have visited Earth, that would not refute the existence of God. Those other creatures would have to have been created by God. Only an intelligent force outside of the universe could have created what is within the universe.

Fred Hoyle and other scientists have advanced the idea of “panspermia,” meaning that life on Earth was seeded by aliens from elsewhere in the universe. There is absolutely no evidence for that, but even if true, it would not explain where those intelligent beings came from. It has been scientifically established that the universe had a beginning. That was the beginning of time, space, matter, and energy, so whatever caused the universe’s origin was outside of time and space and not material. That is the way the Bible describes God. Don’t let space aliens and Disclosure Day interfere with your faith in the one who created all things. (See Colossians 1:15-16.)

Reference: moviemaker.com

April 23, 2026April 22, 2026

Two Views of the Universe

Prominent atheists recently became upset by Victor Glover’s words aboard Artemis 2 during its history-making trip around the Moon. Some even expressed concern about the “separation of church and space.” We have written before about Victor Glover and his status as a Bible-believing Christian. When he spoke from space, he seemed to receive approval from the other astronauts, but not from atheists on the ground. We see the contrast between the two views of the universe.

Some of Glover’s words that apparently upset atheists include, “You’re on a spaceship called Earth that was created to give us a place to live in the universe…You are special. In all of this emptiness, this is a whole bunch of nothing, this thing we call the universe, you have this oasis, this beautiful place that we get to exist together…” Why should those words distress anyone?

Historically, many early scientists explored creation because they believed in an orderly universe created by an intelligent God. Many astronauts have said that being in space gave them a spiritual experience as they realized that Earth reveals design and purpose. I remember watching the Apollo 8 crew read from the book of Genesis on Christmas Day in 1968 as they traveled around the Moon. Our present NASA administrator, Jared Isaacman, said that his time in space convinced him that “the heavens declare the glory of God.”

Many leading science popularizers have tried to tell us that science destroys Christian belief. Richard Dawkins, Bill Nye, Michael Shermer, Lawrence Krauss, and others have written popular books arguing that science makes belief in God unnecessary and implausible. The two views of the universe can’t both be correct. The truth is that scientific discoveries continue to support belief in God and challenge the atheist concept.

Years ago, Carl Sagan said that Earth is such a tiny dot in the universe that it shows we have no privileged position in the cosmos. Victor Glover said that we are not a lonely cosmic accident, but instead, we are loved. On April 30, 2026, the movie “The Story of Everything” will open in select theaters nationwide. It will compare the two views of the universe—the atheist view and the biblical view that God designed and created all things and that He loves us. I think the movie will show that God’s story is the best and that it is actually supported by science.

References: scienceandculture.com HERE and HERE. You can see Victor Glover’s statement from space HERE. Click H ERE for more information about “The Story of Everything.”