God’s Intelligence and Design in Apple Trees

God’s Intelligence and Design in Apple Trees

The plant world demonstrates God’s intelligence and design. Plants provide food for all animal life on Earth, including insects and microbes. The nutrients found in plants vary from one species or variety to another, as do the needs of the animals, insects, and microbes that feed on them. Many plant-animal relationships are symbiotic, with each depending on the other for food, pollination, or seed dispersal.

For humans, plant variations provide dietary necessities and enjoyment. Most of us know that apples come in different varieties. We know that a Jonathan and a Fuji differ in appearance and taste, but they may also differ in nutritional value. Scientific American reported that there are about 2,500 apple varieties in the United States, but only about 100 are grown commercially, and just 15 are the most popular.

Here in the Midwest, different varieties meet the needs of various animals. Deer eat some apple varieties and shun others. The nutrients in these varieties vary, and deer are programmed to eat those that benefit them. As Americans’ diets have changed, so have the kinds of apples we eat. The chemicals in our foods affect what we like.

Humans have worked with apple trees over centuries to develop apples with the desired characteristics of taste, appearance, and disease resistance. This incredibly complex system is a great example of God’s design. We can call the development of new cultivars microevolution, but they are still apples. Enjoy the varieties you prefer, knowing they are not the way they are by accident. They express God’s intelligence and design in the genetics of apple trees.  

— John N. Clayton © 2026

Molecules Exist as Mirror Images

Molecules Exist as Mirror Images

Whether you are right-handed or left-handed, your body uses left-handed amino acids to build proteins and right-handed sugars in DNA. What does that mean? This molecular “handedness,” known as chirality, means molecules exist as mirror images—left- and right-handed versions of the same molecule. Practically all of life’s amino acids are left-handed, and its sugars are right-handed. Why? Scientists don’t know. No natural process explains this bias because in nature the mixture is generally 50:50.

This chirality matters for drugs. One chiral form may treat disease while the other may be inert or even toxic. Historically, drugmakers produced racemic (50:50) mixtures, sometimes causing unwanted side effects. Thalidomide is an example, with one handedness (enantiomer) causing birth defects. However, even if this drug is homochiral (single-handed), it can become racemic in the body.

The 2026 Nobel Prize in Chemistry honored Henri Kagan (Paris-Sud University) and Kenso Soai (Tokyo University of Science) for developing “asymmetric catalysis,” enabling the selective synthesis of homochiral (single-handed) molecules. Kagan pioneered chiral catalysis in the 1960s, and Soai refined it in 2003. Their work enabled the pharmaceutical industry to produce homochiral drugs. For example, Eli Lilly produced a left-handed cough suppressant, Novrad, and a right-handed version called Darvon, an opioid painkiller. The molecules (and their names) are mirror images of each other.

The work of Kagan and Soai solved “how” to make single-handed drugs—not “why” life itself is homochiral. That remains unexplained. In nature, molecules exist as mirror images in roughly equal numbers. That means the formation of life from non-living matter (abiogenesis) faces a paradox. Random chemistry yields equal left- and right-handed forms, yet life requires near-perfect homochirality to fold functional proteins and replicate DNA. No known natural mechanism can do that. Is it reasonable to suggest that an external influence, an intelligent agent, was involved? We think this is another indicator that life is not an accident but God’s creation.

— Roland Earnst © 2026

Reference: smithsonianmag.com

Bird Migration System

Bird Migration System

Yesterday we looked at bird migration, particularly why birds migrate, and noted several reasons. The facts indicate a bird migration system that defies a chance explanation.

According to the All About Birds website, “On a single autumn night with favorable winds, there can be more than one billion birds in the air over the United States alone.” That is more birds than people in the U.S. There are more than 300 species of birds in North America that migrate long distances, which has a major effect on life on this planet.

To prepare for a long-distance flight, a bird must bulk up. The bird must be in top physical condition for flying, with energy stored for a grueling flight with infrequent or no stops. The timing also must be right. That means the bird must assess the weather and know when it’s right. Many other factors are involved in the bird migration system.

An interesting fact about bird migration is that they can travel thousands of miles, often along the same route, and arrive in the same place year after year. Even young birds migrate on their own just a couple of months after they hatch. So how can they find their winter home even though they’ve never been there before? Birds use many navigation methods, including the magnetic field, the sun, the moon, and stars. They also use familiar landmarks like ridges, rivers, and other features. They even use their sense of smell. With all that in mind, they must avoid predators and handle storms, strong winds, and sometimes human-made threats such as artificial light, communication towers, wind turbines, and tall buildings.

To learn more about what’s happening in bird migration today, check out the BirdCast website. There, you can see how many birds are moving across the lower forty-eight United States. The more we examine it, the more we see that the bird migration system defies a chance explanation. It’s another evidence of God’s design.

— Roland Earnst

— Roland Earnst © 2026

Reference: allaboutbirds.org

Why Birds Migrate

Why Birds Migrate

Each spring and fall, billions of birds migrate. In autumn, they head south from North America. Most birds travel at night because the winds are calmer and there are fewer predators. Raptors migrate during the day, giving songbirds and others a chance to stay safe at night. Have you ever thought about why birds migrate?

Birds migrate for several reasons, but some benefit ecosystems more than the birds themselves. One reason for migration is food. In North America, during spring and summer, there can be plenty of food from insects and the seeds and fruits of plants. When fall comes, it gets colder, most insects disappear, and plants stop growing, so the birds head south to find more food.

In the spring, birds migrate northward to breed. Northern forests and areas of open land in North America are less crowded than tropical forests. So, birds can more easily find suitable nesting sites to raise their young. A factor that we often overlook is the amount of daylight. During the breeding season, birds need plenty of daylight to care for their young, feed them, and teach them to fly. At the equator, daylight lasts around 12 hours year-round. But farther north, especially in Arctic areas, summer daylight lasts much longer. This benefits nesting birds. Longer days and more sunshine also mean that plants grow and produce seeds, and insects are abundant for the birds to eat.

Avoiding cold temperatures is another factor in why birds migrate, but it is not as important as you might think. In fact, some birds migrate not to areas closer to the equator, but farther south, where there’s more daylight. When the Northern Hemisphere is in winter, the Southern Hemisphere is enjoying summer. So, some birds—such as Arctic terns and bar-tailed godwits—travel from one extreme of the Northern Hemisphere far down into the Southern Hemisphere.

There is another factor in why birds migrate. In some cases, migration benefits the ecosystem more than the birds. As birds migrate, they benefit other plants and animals along the way. That doesn’t fit the “survival of the fittest” concept of evolution. Migrating birds can also help other animals by serving as prey and help plants by scattering seeds.

The bottom line is that birds migrate for several reasons. Migrations benefit birds directly, but they also benefit other plants and animals along their migration route and in the areas where they stop. Looking at the whole picture, we see a designed system. It is a system that provides for the birds and nourishes the ecosystems of planet Earth. There is more to bird migration that indicates system design, and we’ll look at other factors tomorrow.

— Roland Earnst © 2026

Engineers Look to Nature for Solutions

Engineers Look to Nature for Solutions

We have noted before that many times engineers look to nature for solutions to design problems. This biomimicry helps us create new or more efficient devices. We imitated birds to achieve flight. Now aeronautical engineers are imitating a particular bird to create drones and aircraft that can maneuver in difficult situations.

A small Australian falcon called the nankeen kestrel (Falco cenchroides) can perform aerial maneuvers that outpace even advanced aircraft. It is among the world’s most stable flyers, able to make fine adjustments in flight when wind conditions try to blow it off course. Drones, or Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), have limited maneuverability because of weight, cost, or mechanical limitations. An international team of researchers has been experimenting with robot replicas of the nankeen kestrels to create more versatile UAVs.

Matt Penn is a co-author of the study and an engineer at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT). He explained, “Birds don’t rely on a single response to wind gusts. They constantly adjust their wings and tails to stay balanced, while the natural flexibility of their feathers and joints helps absorb sudden changes in airflow.” The goal is to create UAVs that can mimic these subtle adjustments in flight.

Giving a robotic flying device the ability to emulate all the fine movements of the nankeen kestrel will be a design and engineering challenge. It seems to me that such a UAV would also need artificial intelligence to make subtle adjustments in real time while in the air. Think about the intelligence needed to design such a UAV. Then consider the intelligence needed to design the kestrel. It is not just a machine, but a living creature with everything it needs to sustain life while flying. This bird is no accident of natural selection, but an intelligently designed engineering marvel.

Another co-author of the research report, RMIT engineer Abdulghani Mohamed, said, “This research shows what’s possible when engineers look to nature for solutions.” I suggest it shows what is possible when we look at the handiwork of the Designer of life.

— Roland Earnst © 2026

 Reference: popsci.com

 You can find previous articles about biomimicry HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, and HERE

Viewing Earth from Space

Viewing Earth from Space

In 1987, Houghton Mifflin published a book by Frank White titled The Overview Effect. White based the book on the perspectives of astronauts who have experienced what it’s like to view Earth from outer space. He described an “inner cognitive shift in awareness” that comes from seeing Earth from space. He has since interviewed more astronauts, including some who are retired and others who were in space when he interviewed them. These additional interviews led to the publication of a fourth edition of The Overview Effect in 2021.

Recently, the astronauts on SpaceX’s Crew-12 mission, which ran from February 13 to October 8, 2026, shared their reflections after returning to Earth. Mission commander Jessica Meir said in a press conference: “I wish that I could bring all the eyes of all the humans to look back at the Earth in this extraordinary way that we are so privileged to have. I think it really does change you philosophically and how you see each other, how you see yourself, how you see the human race when you look on it down from the vantage point that we have from above.” She said that it “gives everybody this understanding that we need to protect our planet, that it’s not only so beautiful, but it’s so precious.”

As we look at all the turmoil, wars, and crimes happening in the world, it would be good if everyone could see our planet from the perspective of space. However, that alone won’t change human nature. A temporary overview of Earth from space can’t change sinful hearts. The real solution to our Earthly dilemma requires a permanent change that only God can give.

“What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don’t they come from your desires that battle within you? You desire but do not have, so you kill. You covet, but you cannot get what you want, so you quarrel and fight” (James 4:1-20). “Submit yourselves, then, to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you. Come near to God, and he will come near to you” (James 4:7). Viewing Earth from space might bring a new perspective on our planet, but looking at humans from God’s point of view is the overview effect that we need to have.

— Roland Earnst © 2026

References: space.com HERE and HERE

When a Star Explodes

When a Star Explodes
Artist’s Conception of a Supernova explosion

Last month, in September 2026, astronomers observed an exploding star. When a star explodes, it becomes a supernova. The supernova now being observed is in a spiral galaxy about 45 million light-years away from Earth in the constellation Pegasus. The galaxy is known as NGC 7331, and the star in question has been designated SN2026aaiv.

It is important to know how far away this galaxy is, and astronomers can confirm the distance using various measurement methods. Since this exploding star is 45 million light-years away, it means the star exploded 45,000,000 years ago. Astronomers observe several thousand supernovae in distant galaxies every year, but the last one observed in our Milky Way galaxy was in 1604. We mentioned before that in 1987 a supernova occurred in the Large Magellanic Cloud, which is only 160,000 light-years away, so it was only 160,000 years ago.

 What is the purpose of exploding stars? When a star explodes and becomes a supernova, conditions are right to create heavier elements, without which we could not exist. Without heavier elements such as iron, copper, gold, lead, and uranium, Earth wouldn’t be here, and neither would we. Supernovae also produce oxygen and silicon.

In the long, distant past, God used supernovae to create the elements that made life possible. Suggesting that the universe is only a few thousand years old does not square with the facts. When God established the universe, He started the processes we see happening today. The original hydrogen present soon after the cosmic creation event has gradually formed heavier elements inside stars. When a star explodes and becomes a supernova, it becomes the birthplace of the heaviest elements.

The question we must consider is whether God is playing a trick on us. If the universe is only a few thousand years old, why are we seeing a star millions of light-years away become a supernova? If it didn’t happen 45,000,000 years ago, is God trying to fool us into thinking we are seeing something that never happened? Are we really observing the past when we look deep into space? If astronomers look at the Sun, they are seeing what it was like 8 minutes ago, because that’s how long it takes sunlight to reach us. Compute that out to a star billions of miles away.

If the supernovae we observe aren’t real, then God is trying to fool us by making us think they happened millions of years ago when they happened only a few thousand years ago, or never happened at all. I don’t believe that our creator God is deceptive. He keeps His promises, and you can’t keep promises if you deceive people. (See Titus 1:2 and Hebrews 6:18. )There’s plenty of evidence that God exists, and when a star explodes, we see evidence that the universe is billions of years old.

— Roland Earnst © 2026

Reference: space.com

Something Rather than Nothing

Something Rather than Nothing

If someone tells you that God doesn’t exist, ask them: if there is no God, why is there anything at all? In other words, “Why is there something rather than nothing?”

After many years, even centuries, of insisting that the universe is eternal and had no beginning, scientists finally reached the consensus that the universe had a beginning. There was once no time, space, or matter/energy. Nothing existed. According to currently accepted science, the universe, including matter, energy, space, and time, came into existence approximately 13.8 billion years ago. If none of those things existed, what caused them to come into existence?

The beginning is commonly known as the Big Bang, but I prefer to call it the Cosmic Creation Event. If nothing existed before then, how did the universe come into existence? Whatever explanation you suggest, it must be outside of space and time and immaterial. Those things could not have created themselves. Einstein’s famous E=Mc2 equation (energy equals mass times the speed of light squared) tells us that matter and energy are two forms of the same thing.

If nothing existed before the Cosmic Creation Event or Big Bang, why does anything exist now? What originated the things we can see and measure—the universe and even ourselves? In other words, why is there something rather than nothing? I suggest that if you think about what could have caused the beginning, it would have to be outside of time and space and immaterial—something unseen. What could that be? “By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God’s command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible” (Hebrews 11:3). The God described in the Bible perfectly matches the requirements for the ultimate cause. (See Genesis 1:1.)

— Roland Earnst © 2026

The Size of Animals in the Fossil Record

The Size of Animals in the Fossil Record

One question better answered by creation by God than by other explanations is why animals were so big in the past and so small today. In Smithsonian Magazine for September/October 2026, Dr. Floyd Shockley, the collections manager of entomology at the National Museum of Natural History, gives the traditional explanation for the size of animals in the fossil record.

The data on this issue involves two things. One is the fact that the level of oxygen in Earth’s atmosphere was higher in the past than it is today (35% in the past as opposed to 21% today). The other is the fact that all major groups of animal life have become smaller today. We are all familiar with the fossil remains of huge dinosaurs. Less publicized is the fact that insects were also huge compared to their relatives today. Is an animal’s size related to how much oxygen it breathes? If so, animals living at higher elevations should be smaller than those at lower elevations. That is simply not the case.

Size is more directly related to diet than to a 14% difference in oxygen levels. The ecology of various environments is also a factor. Habitat design involves interactions between plant and animal life. Scientists have conducted interesting experiments in which they tried to design a closed habitat that would last for many years. Without external interference from the scientists, those habitats have collapsed.

The size of animals in the fossil record shows great intelligence in how animal and plant sizes interact. God was preparing the planet for humans and the resources we would need. No single factor accounts for how life was created, and no chance process can explain the facts we see. It reminds us of Romans 1:20, which tells us that “…since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities – His eternal power and divine nature have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.”

— John N. Clayton © 2026

Sockeye Salmon Make an Incredible Journey

Sockeye Salmon Make an Incredible Journey
Sockeye Salmon Make an Incredible Journey

This salmon species is known for its bright red skin during the spawning season. Sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) are native to the northern Pacific Ocean and the rivers that flow into it.

In the ocean, sockeye salmon don’t look like they do in spawning mode. Instead, they are a pale turquoise to deep blue, with silvery hues on the belly. They don’t begin to change color until the migration season. The change begins when they swim into the freshwater rivers and streams where they hatched. Eventually, the salmon’s body becomes bright red, with a green head.

The life cycle of sockeye salmon is hard to explain by natural selection. Juvenile sockeye are hatched in freshwater, where they remain for up to three years. Eventually, the fish decides it’s time to journey to the sea, where it will grow larger. It will follow the river downstream up to 1,000 miles (1,600 km) to reach the ocean. We don’t know how the fish know when the time is right or why they feel the urge to relocate, but they are programmed to carry out this incredible journey.

The sockeye stays in the ocean for one to four years, growing rapidly and feeding mainly on zooplankton. After some time, something triggers the fish’s brain, telling it to leave the ocean and swim upstream to the place of its origin. As the journey begins, the fish will stop eating. If it completes the journey, it spawns and dies there. Many do not make it because, along the way, they become food for predators such as bears, or even humans. Although sockeye salmon are among the smaller of the seven Pacific salmon species, humans prize their meat.

Sockeye salmon are endangered in some areas, while plentiful in others. In the regions where these salmon are abundant, they significantly influence their ecosystem. Salmon runs bring vast amounts of marine nutrients from the ocean to rivers, sustaining a healthy ecosystem. As evidence of how God has given living creatures the ability to adapt, some salmon do not migrate. Instead, they spend their entire lives in freshwater lakes, where they are known as kokanee salmon.

If evolution is directed by survival of the fittest, why would sockeye salmon make the journey to the ocean and back to their place of origin? Their return journey benefits the ecosystem and their predators, but not the salmon themselves. They die whether they serve as food for bears or complete the journey. Who programmed into these fish the ability to find the place where they hatched? These beautiful fish play a critical role in their habitat and demonstrate a designed system that requires a Designer.

— Roland Earnst © 2026

Click HERE for information on Atlantic salmon.